I believe that if we are to restore our country to it’s former greatness, there are five areas in which restoration will need to be made in America.

1. Revive a concrete Faith in God
2. Rebirth Traditional Family Values
3. Renew a national pursuit of truth
4. Reclaim education without government intervention
5. Rebuild a legal system of natural law

Let me explain to you why I picked these five categories as what I am calling: The Five Pillars of American Restoration. I picked them because I truly believe that the problems in our country can all be largely mitigated by the restoration of these ideals. I also hold it to be true that our civil society cannot be restored without the restoration of these five ideals.

While I believe that all of these are essential to America’s recovery, I do hold that our lack of faith in God has been the main reason for our decay over the past century or so. Since I believe that restoring this faith in God is the first thing that we must do to save our country and the principles it was founded on, I have placed it first on the list.

Pillar#1: Restore a concrete faith in God

“A nation without God’s guidance is a nation without order. Happy are those who keep God’s law!” Proverbs 29:18 (Today’s English Version)

The second pillar of restoration will likely hit home for most of you, because it is the Re-birthing of traditional family values in the household. It is plain to me that without such re-birthing, we cannot be the nation of laws that we once were. In our society, the family has been distorted immensely to the point where it no longer resembles that purpose which God ordained for it. This is shown in many popular Hollywood productions. Read a review on The Kids Are All Right and you will see what I am talking about. This distortion has taken away the idea of the man being the head of the household, it has torn down the institution of marriage as being between a man and woman, and has minimized the role of parents to teach and instill values in their children, replacing that with what many call the nanny-state.

Pillar#2: Rebirth traditional family values in the home

Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right. Honour thy father and mother; which is the first commandment with promise;
Ephesians 6:1-2 New International Version Bible

The third pillar of restoration is the renewing of a national pursuit of truth. In the midst of all of the name calling and smearing amongst our politicians and often times amongst citizens who disagree politically, as well as the continuous distortion of facts presented to us by media outlets, it is worth emphasizing a need to return to truth seeking. If we do not pursue the truth, we will fall. We must have judges who judge based on objective, factual evidence whether than political opinion. We must be capable as citizens to examine every side of an issue in order to tell what is right and what is wrong. It is critical that as citizens we pursue the truth in regards to our political views, so that we may find out for ourselves what is true, and not blindly follow political icons or parties like sheep.

Pillar#3: Renew a national pursuit of truth

Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free”-John 8:32 (New International version)

The fourth pillar of restoration is the reclaiming of education without distortion. It is my belief that as a nation we have failed to build an education system that enriches our students with good, well, education. I believe that teaching should be entirely left up to the private sector (private schools), and parents, not the Federal Government. Let me show you a quick example of why this is so. First though, let me tell you that I believe that whenever the Federal Government gets it’s hands on something, it cannot let go, but must (by nature) tighten it’s vice. This is why our Constitutional Republic was designed with checks and balances. That was so that the people can remain in control of their government, and not the other way around. However, in recent decades, the secular progressive movement whose ranks include the likes of Saul Alinsky, John Dewey, and Franklin D. Roosevelt, to name a few historic examples, have slowly infiltrated society and are instituting their belief in a big, centralized government on it as a whole.

In this manner, the education sector has been infiltrated by progressives in the Federal Government, and the majority of children are now educated in public schools that are, of course, run by that same government. However, did you know that public schools are funded by taxes on every American citizen? Even for those who do not choose to take part in them. Furthermore, if you compared the cost of taxes on education with private school tuition, then private schools would be found to be cheaper? Public schools are funded by the entire population, rather than the minority who choose to put their kids in a private school. This is what produces the illusion that public schools are “free”. It is my firm belief that if we were to abolish public schools and taxes on education, and then encourage growth of private schools through the free market, then the overall cost would be substantially lower for the American citizen in comparison to today’s system.

Another problem with the public schools is that of the ideals taught therein. I have more to say about this in a future article, but for now we must move on for brevity purposes. For more information regarding the transformation of education in the public school system, you can visit the education page on the Eagle Forum website.

Pillar #4 Reclaim education without government intervention

5. He decreed statutes for Jacob and established the law in Israel, which he commanded our forefathers to teach their children,
6. so the next generation would know them, even the children yet to be born, and they in turn would tell their children. Psalms 78:5-6

The fifth and final pillar of restoration is the rebuilding of natural law as a legal system. In case you are not familiar with the term natural law let me explain it to you. First off, It has been brought to my attention that there is a natural law party of the United States. I am not familiar with the party, and I cannot endorse that party as legitimate pursuers of natural law for that reason. Natural law, also known as higher law, is a set of laws that are believed by it’s advocates to be self evident by human nature (not that human nature is inclined naturally to obey them, for we are fallen creatures). Let’s examine the legal and cultural definitions for natural law:

It is important that we restore the principles of natural law in our nation as defined in the first two paragraphs of the Declaration of Independence. I want to show you two ways in which natural law no longer governs us as a nation.

Firstly, we have lost respect for the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. For example: We have lost our respect for life by allowing abortions nationwide and rationing health care through health care “reform”. I and a friend debated on the subject at the Teens for Liberty forums.

Secondly, I think there has been a shift in the cultural mindset here in America in the past century. This shift has been aided by the progressives who have wormed there way into our legal system. This shift that I am speaking of is the shift from belief in the right to the pursuit of happiness, to the belief in a right to happiness itself. I call people who buy into this mindset: “entitlement seekers”. These are the people, many of whom my father has had to deal with in the past where he works, who would rather not get a job because they would rather sit at home and live off of the unemployment checks that they receive in the mail from the Feds.

Many of the lies that the progressive majority in Congress and especially in the Obama Administration circulate daily revolve around the premise that you are entitled to happiness. In effect they are attempting to replace the entrepreneurial spirit with that of socialism. There is a difference between every citizen having a level playing ground an an equal shot at the pie that the individual next to them has, and every citizen having an equal share of the pie. Of course, a full discourse on the issues with socialism will have to be saved for another posting, so I will go no further.

Those are the five pillars of restoration that I propose we should focus on repairing. A house divided upon itself cannot stand, and neither can a house stand whose pillars have been torn down. More on this to come soon so subscribe and stick around.

-Calvin Lyman

In this article you will see how Cap and Trade accomplishes this feat, and who exactly is benefiting from it. It is highly important that we get this information out to as many as possible, so I ask that you click on the “share” button underneath this article and post it to your twitter, facebook, myspace or any other social networking website listed that suits you. Furthermore, I challenge you to look up everything I say and determine for yourself to see if the arguments that I present to you are reliable. After all, if you are debating with a progressive over the effects of Cap and Trade, you need to be able to provide a better defense than “because Glenn Beck or Teens for Liberty said so”.

As I said before, Cap and Trade is disguised as a bill that will reduce carbon output throughout the States. This will supposedly be done by allowing the creation and trading of “carbon credits” between factories in the US. These credits represent carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere. Thus, the more credits, the more carbon dioxide you are allowed to put into the atmosphere. However, if this was really about saving the planet then there would be no allowing of the trading of these credits between factories.

Furthermore, the Cap and Trade legislation, if passed, will enforce regulations on gas emissions by forcing companies that emit more gas to give money to companies that emit less gas (Marxism!), all the while providing the Marxists with a get rich quick fix.

In order for this scheme to work, the progressives need a market for their “carbon credits”. Since they are selling imaginary items, they need to set up a market specifically for those items because no existing market will sell them. Enter the Joyce Foundation. The Joyce Foundation, on whose Board of Directors President Barrack Obama served in 2000 and 2001 gave nearly $1.1 million in two separate grants that were “instrumental in developing and launching the privately-owned Chicago Climate Exchange, which now calls itself “North America’s only cap and trade system for all six greenhouse gases, with global affiliates and projects worldwide.”

Now that the progressives have set up a market for their invisible products, they are in need of investors who will buy into the CCX. Not surprisingly, Al Gore’s company Generation Investment Management is one of the ones to buy into the CCX. Another company to pitch in is Goldman Sachs with the purchase of 10% of the Exchange.It is my opinion that the public trials of Goldman Sachs are just a distraction from the real deal. Goldman Sachs is posing as a scapegoat for Cap and Trade in order to get a piece of the multi trillion dollar pie as an end result.

So now that they have the market and some people who will buy into it, they are going to need the technology to run their new market.

Not to worry, here comes Franklin Reins, former CEO of Fannie Mae, who purchases the patent on November 7th, 2006. November 7th being the day following the Democrat’s take over of Congress. No doubt Reins waited until then so that he would have the assurance that enough members of Congress would back this bill before patenting it.

Side Note- I wonder, what the BoD over at Fannie thought about their CEO buying this technology? Fannie is a Government Sponsored Enterprise whose purpose, as stated in their mission statement: is to “provide liquidity, stability and affordability to the U.S. housing and mortgage markets.”

At this point in our investigation, we see that the progressives have pulled together a get rich quick market on which they can, well, get rich quick on. Furthermore, they can promote their socialist agenda all the while by regulating companies that emit more gas to give money to companies that emit less gas (This is where the Cap and Trade legislation comes in. Although it hasn’t passed yet, Republicans and Democrats are both working on it). They have investors who will buy into the CCX, and they have the technology to fuel this market.

They even have a means of escaping the consequences of their actions when they are caught red handed.

Whenever progressive’s are caught in their trickery, they dissolve into a maze of various progressive networks. For example, you may have heard that ACORN recently disbanded due to video evidence of ACORN speaking to two undercover conservative activists posing as a pimp and prostitute, where the activists ask two employees about how to shield their work from state and federal tax requirements. The supposed pimp also appears to ask the employees how to conceal underage girls from El Salvador brought into the country illegally to work for him.

After this video was produced, we heard of several ACORN chapters disbanding and its Federal funding being revoked. If you were like me, your first reaction was excitement that this shadowy organization that purportedly engaged in voter fraudulence in a close election that ended in favor of a marxist candidate for the Presidency was finally getting what it deserved.

However, after a closer look, it appears that ACORN is not disbanding, but rather transforming. Several chapters have been melting into other progressive groups around the country that share the same goals. Don’t believe me? Hear it from the words of Bertha Lewis, CEO of ACORN:

“First of all, let me set the record straight. Rumors of our demise have been greatly exaggerated. We are transforming, of course. I’ve been transforming this organization since June of 2008. And, yes, we’ve had our financial woes, and, yes, we are fighting an unconstitutional ban on any government funding.”

In an interview with Lewis that National Public Radio’s Tell Me More is airing, the ACORN CEO says:

“We’ve gotten leaner and meaner and some of our state chapters have chosen to go their own way. We haven’t been able to maintain the resources, state by state, that we had. So we have gotten a little bit smaller. We’ve had to change some of our programming, but we’re not dead yet.”

I believe that the ability to find information about such things is a skill that we all must have if we are to succeed, so that we are not entirely dependent on media outlets in order to get our information. On that note, I have provided links to several places where you can get more information on this subject. Again I ask that you please click on the “share” button underneath this article and send this to your twitter page, facebook page, myspace or other social network.

Of course, just because we link to the content below, we do not necessarily endorse their views or source of information. I advise you to use the information provided here and elsewhere with caution, continually checking their accuracy. The spreading of misinformation is very dangerous to our cause.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/25/obama-years-ago-helped-fund-carbon-program-pushing-congress/

http://www.marketswiki.com/mwiki/Chicago_Climate_Exchange

http://www.fanniemae.com/kb/index?page=home&c=aboutus

http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2010/03/acorn_not_dead_yet_leader_asse.html

http://www.onenewsnow.com/Culture/Default.aspx?id=958482

http://www.foxnews.com/projects/pdf/032509_report00.pdf

These are the lyrics from Mark Lindsay’s 1969, one hit wonder, Arizona. But, I think we need to add some honorary lyrics to this song!  How about: Arizona, land of the illegal immigrants, or even better! How about: Arizona, where the illegal’s run wild and free. It seems to fit the song perfectly!

Living in Arizona, I know first hand the truthfulness of these lyrics!  Our borders are virtually unprotected allowing hundreds of Mexicans to come across the border illegally each year!  Not only does this steal jobs from us legal Americans, it causes a national security threat!

Just this year, Arizona has lost three American life’s to illegal aliens.  They are pouring across the border in hopes for a better life, they are searching after the American dream!  This is one thing I respect.  They see what our country has to offer!  The only thing they seem not to see though are the laws of the land!  Now, do not get me wrong:  I support immigration 100%.  Its what makes our country great!  We are the melting pot!  But I do not support immigration if it means that immigrants will be coming in illegally!!  ITS ILLEGAL!

This week when the story about a new immigration bill in Arizona hit the national news I was thrilled! This bill will crack down on illegal immigrants and will give the police authority to question suspected illegal immigrants.  Although the national news makes this out as if Arizona is split over this issue, here locally we are thrilled!  We are tired of illegal’s taking our jobs and killing our people!

Last week this really hit me hard.  One of my good friends was shot twice ,by an illegal, in an attempted to break into his house.  This is why this bill needs to be passed!  I am not saying that all illegal immigrants are bad people.  All I am saying is that illegals are in fact illegal, and we MUST do something to stop these people from crossing our borders illegally.

-Daniel

The fact is that government does not have the right or obligation to take control over our health care system. Instead this is a right that is reserved for either the State or the people. Would you like to know where this is said in the Constitution? The Tenth Amendment states that:

The powers delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

The Federal Government simply does not have the authority to initiate an overhaul of our health care system, as is seen in the Tenth Amendment.

During the heat of the 2008 Presidential Campaign Obama was asked about his stance on a issue. Instead of giving a direct answer he said, “ Judge me by the people I surround myself with.” Okay Mr. President we will do just that! The first person that we are going to look at is former Green Jobs Czar, Van Jones. During a speech to college students Van Jones said this, “ our Native American brothers and sisters who were shoved into all the land that we didn’t want, Guess what? Give them the wealth! Give them then wealth! No justice on stolen land … we owe them a debt” OK so there is one person that Obama surrounds himself with, and he ended up being a supporter of socialism. But we have to be fair here. Lets look at some other people Obama “surrounds” himself with.

Lets take a look at Anita Dunn. Anita is the Former White House Communication’s Director. During a speech to high school students Anita said ,”the two people I admire most is Mother Teresa and Chairman Mao” IN order to fully comprehend what this quote means, we need to understand who Chairman Mao was. Mao took office in 1943. He killed a total of 70 million people while he was in office. That is more than Hitler,Stalin,and Hussein had killed…COMBINED! Now not only did he commit mass genocide, he only had one way of thinking when it came to Economics. Socialism.

Okay so now that we have seen some of the people that Obama surrounds himself with and what they support, lets look at Obama’s words. During Obama’s campaign he made a stop in a small town in Ohio. While he was there, a man by the name of Joe Wurzelbacher was in his lawn playing football with his son, and he noticed Obama taking questions. He explained that by working hard (10-12 hours a day) he was in a position to buy a business. If he bought a truck and expanded the business, he wondered if his success would be greeted by a penalty in the form of higher taxes.

Obama answered,” It’s not that I want to punish your success, I just want to make sure that everybody who is behind you, that they’ve got a chance for success too. My attitude is that if the economy’s good for folks from the bottom up, it’s gonna be good for everybody … I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody.”Spread the wealth around. That means take from the evil bad guys with all the money, and taking the money of those who worked their whole life to earn, and give it to the guys on the couch with a six pack of beer and a half empty bag of potato chips!

On July 4^th, 1776 a group of 56 men got together and wrote a document that would change the world. A document that was based on God, honesty, justice, liberty and most of all hard work. Our country was founded with men in a suit and tie. People in our country worked to get what they had. They got their hands dirty, worked all day and night, and worked their way to success. When our country was founded there wasn’t talk of socialism or capitalism! They knew that in order to reap a harvest they had to be out there tilling the ground, planting seeds, and watering the ground so that when harvest comes they will have a full crop.

When our country was founded there was no such thing as Socialism. In fact there was no such thing as capitalism! The only thing they knew is what every human being knows: What one earns is what one keeps. For two hundred years our country has worked and thrived under this system, why in the world would we try to change the system now?

Based on who Obama surrounds himself with and based on what he has said, I think it is safe to say that yes, Obama is a socialist. And yes Obama wants to Steal from the rich and give to the lazy..oops, I mean poor. Obama has made history in many ways by becoming president, but if he accomplishes everything on his hidden agenda of socialism, history will not only be made, it will be changed. We wont be the strongest nation anymore that our history books paint a picture of. We will be the country that doesn’t have any motivation to work hard, because the government will give us everything we need. We wont be who our founding fathers meant for us to be.

Thomas Jefferson, a very influential founder and our nation’s third President, was a staunch supporter of religious freedom. In a letter to the Dansbury Baptists, he calls the First Amendment: “A wall of separation between church and State”. Many allude to Thomas Jefferson’s misleading metaphor, using it to justify the removing of public displays of Christianity, and then they themselves incorrectly describe the First Amendment as such. In actuality, the first amendment was created in order to restrict the Federal government from favoring one sect of Christianity over another, as well as to allow citizens of any religion to display it in public.

The Declaration of Independence contains public expression of devotion to the Christian God when it uses phrases like these:

“Nature’s God” (i.e., an 18th century way to refer to the God Who created nature), “all men are created equal” and “endowed by their Creator,” “appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world,” and “with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence” (The Declaration…)

The Federal Constitution:

George Mason, the “Father of the Bill of Rights” proposed the following as the text for the first Amendment:

[A]ll men have an equal, natural and unalienable right to the free exercise of religion, according to the dictates of conscience; and that no particular sect or society of Christians ought to be favored or established by law in preference to others (Rowland, 1892, 1:244, emp. added).

America was considered a Christian nation for nearly two centuries. The above was suggested as text for the First Amendment because the founders wanted to ensure that no particular sect of Christianity was elevated above the others, as well as to make it certain that the Federal government did not adopt a State religion. Since the early 20th Century, radical socialistic organizations like the ACLU (American Civil Liberties Union) have been trying (and largely succeeding) to erase Christianity from the public arena. In 2003, at the same time that a  Federal Judge told the Chief Justice of the Alabama State Supreme Court that a public display of the Ten Commandments had to be taken down, California unveiled in Sacramento, at the California Veterans Memorial that reads: “In Honor of Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and Transgender Veterans Killed in Action” (Sanders, 2003)

This kind of thing exposes the true liberal agenda. The fact is that America was originally intended to be a Christian nation. The ACLU has been attacking the Christian faith for ninety years, wrongly asserting that the public display of  religion is what The First Amendment was made to repel. However, quite the opposite is true. The First Amendment was made in order to allow every citizen to practice his religion of choice freely in private or public without any opposition by the Federal government. One must look no further than the delegate discussions pertaining to the First amendment (Annals of Congress, 1789), to see that pluralization of America’s culture was not the objective.

As further proof that America was founded on Christian principles, the Federal constitution contains a direct reference to Jesus Christ! Read the following excerpt from Article 1 section 7 to see what I am referring to:
“If any Bill shall not be returned by the President within ten Days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a Law, in like Manner as if he had signed it….”

Sunday is the day of the week when Christians traditionally meet together in congregations across the globe and worship God. If the founders wanted to show pluratism, they wouldn’t have picked Sunday. If they wanted to acknowledge Jewish custom, they would have picked Saturday. But they picked Sunday, yet another example of early Americans showing devotion towards their Creator in a public and political place.

Immediately after Article 7, the Constitution closes with these words:

Done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America the Twelfth….

Christianity dates human history in terms of the birth of Christ. B.C stands for “Before Christ”, and A.D. is the abbreviation for the Latin words “anno Domini,” meaning “year of our Lord.”

There is no doubt that America was founded on Christianity. However, this does mean that citizens of other nations cannot live in America and enjoy the same freedom as the rest of us do.

On March 4, 1921, right after the close of World War I, Warren G. Harding delivered his inaugural speech:

One cannot stand in this presence and be unmindful of the tremendous responsibility. The world upheaval has added heavily to our tasks. But with the realization comes the surge of high resolve, and there is reassurance in belief in the God-given destiny of our Republic. If I felt that there is to be sole responsibility in the Executive for the America of tomorrow I should shrink from the burden. But here are a hundred millions, with common concern and shared responsibility, answerable to God and country. The Republic summons them to their duty, and I invite co-operation. I accept my part with single-mindedness of purpose and humility of spirit, and implore the favor and guidance of God in His Heaven. With these I am unafraid, and confidently face the future. I have taken the solemn oath of office on that passage of Holy Writ wherein it is asked: “What doth the Lord require of thee but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God?” [Micah 6:8—DM]. This I plight to God and country (1921, emp. added)

Don’t let these liberals tell you that America is a religiously neutral country, and that you cannot exercise your freedom of religion in the public realm. America was set up so that everyone would have that freedom.

-Calvin

Thursday night I read an article that a friend of mine has posted to the forums, where he talked about the subject of population control, and I decided to write my own feelings about the matter.

Proponents of population control have been telling us for several decades now that there are too many people in the world. The UN pushes for its members to practice population control, which usually includes abortion, euthanasia, and contraceptives. For example, in China you are only allowed to have one child, and in some cases two. And you have to pay for the right to have even one child. Many advocates of population control have been pushing for the United States to reduce our population by similar methods. Take, for example, this exerpt from James Coleman and Donald Cressey’s Social Problems, one of the standard social science textbooks from the nineties:
The world’s population is exploding. The number of men, women and children is now over 5 billion. … If the current rate of growth continues, the world’s population will double again in the next 40 years…the dangers of runaway population growth can be seen in historical perspective… It took all of human history until 1800 for the world’s population to reach 1 billion people. But the next … 1 billion was added in only 130 years (1800-1930), [the next billion] after that in 30 years (1930-1960), and the next in 15 years (1960-1975). The last billion people were added in only 12 years (1975-1987). If this trend (of runaway population growth) continues the world will be soon be adding a billion people a year, and eventually every month. [Italics added]

The proponents of population control argue that the world’s population has been doubling so fast because people were breeding like rabbits, when in reality, it was due to life expectancy increasing dramatically. During the period of time covered in the passage above, the fertility rate has been decreasing. consider this excerpt from the Population Research Institute, in an article titled: The White Pestilence:

Like other Baby Boomers, I lived through the unprecedented doubling of the global population in the second half of the 20^th century. Never before in human history had our numbers increased so far, so fast: from 3 billion in 1960 to 6 billion in 2000. But Ehrlich and Company, I came to see, glossed over the underlying reason: Our numbers didn’t double because we suddenly started breeding like rabbits. They doubled because we stopped dying like flies. Fertility was falling throughout this period, from an average of 6 children per woman in 1960 to only 2.6 by 2002.

Speaking of the life expectancy rate going up drastically, have you heard of the pesticide called DDT? DDT is a pesticide used to fight back against malaria and other insect borne diseases. In 1970 the National Academy of Sciences, in their book Life Sciences, stated that,

“In little more than two decades DDT has prevented 500 million deaths due to malaria.”

After DDT was proven to be the most harmless pesticide known to man, the UN pushed for the banning of DDT, and was successful. The UN is a big supporter of population control , so this doesn’t come as a suprise to me. It is sobering to see world powers use their power to ban the use of a substance that has saved millions of lives in the past, all because they think there are too many people in the world.

So back to the dropping fertility rate. Those who push population control argue that we are going to see a population explosion in the next few decades, however, for several decades now, the fertility rate has been dropping immensely.

So why the sudden drop in fertility rate? I think that it is due to the fall of the traditional family. Throughout the world, the number of people who abstain from sexual activity until marriage, as well as the number of people who remain faithful to their spouse, are getting fewer and fewer. And there are many people who would rather stay single, and don’t ever give a thought to having children. I am sure there are many other factors that weigh into this, but this is a big one for sure. Of course population control has played a role as well. Countries that practice population control by putting a limit on the amount of kids that you can have, for example China, have a dangerously low fertility rate.

Because of this, the world’s population is near it’s apex. After that, it will start to fall. That’s right, rather than seeing a population explosion in the next few decades, we are going to see a population implosion. The world’s population is expected to reach it’s apogee in 2040. If current trends in fertility rates continue, then the world’s population at that time is estimated to be around 7.6 billion. After that, it is expected to start falling, reaching 5 billion by the turn of the century.

Population control is evil, and also completely unnecessary. Advocates of population control promise that “cutting out the cancer” will ensure prosperity for the majority at the sacrifice of the minority. Sounds a lot like communism to me. Also, population control will cause problems worldwide that are unimaginable. I will end with yet another excerpt from the Population Research Institute‘s article: The White Pestilence:

By 2004, the U.N. Population Division (UNDP) found that 65 countries, including 22 in the less developed world, had fertility rates that were below the level needed to ensure the long-term survival of the population. Most of the rest, the agency warned, were likely to enter this danger zone over the next few decades. According to the agency’s “low-variant” projection, historically the most accurate, by 2050 three out of every four countries in the less developed regions will be experiencing the same kind of below-replacement fertility that is hollowing out the populations of developed countries today. Such stark drops in fertility, cautioned the UNPD, will result in a rapid aging of the populations of developed and developing countries alike. With the number of people over 65 slated to explode from 475 million in 2000 to 1.46 billion in 2050, existing social security systems will be threatened with collapse. It will prove difficult, if not impossible, to establish new ones.

Population control is a scheme concocted by globalist politicians who don’t push it in order to save the planet, but to gain power and money, no matter what means they have to use to achieve it.

Calvin

Those who support health care reform will try to tell you that our health care is in dire need of reform, and that Obama Care will better it. This is simply untrue. Sure our health care system isn’t perfect, but when it comes to emergency care and specialized treatment, our health care out performs others where health care is regulated and rationed out to the people by government. Although they won’t admit it, Obama Care will do just that. The public option presented in Obama Care,(by the way, Obama will not take this out of health care reform, no matter what he says on TV) is a government regulated alternative to private insurance that become the main source of health care for Americans if the American Affordable Health Choices Act assumes full implementation in 2011.

Another frightning aspect of Obama Care is the massive spending involved. Ever since Obama got elected, the administration has been spending us into oblivion. Earlier this year, Congress passed the Economic Recovery Act of 2009, which cost a total of $800 billion. If passed, Obama Care will cost over $1 trillion!  One day we will pay for all of the spending in Washington. It is critically important to our nation that we stop this massive spending. Already Washington has buried our country in debt that will take years of effort by we the people to get out of.

It is very disappointing to know that so many Americans either don’t know or don’t care about the poor decisions that politicians make these days. If more Americans cared about the welfare of their country, these idiots would not have ever been elected. It is our job to educate ourselves of the world around us, and to speack out in defence of our beliefs. This current crisis has arisen from our lack of ability to stand up and fight for what we believe in. Let’s take back our country.

Calvin